Bella De Soto
Under construction...
page4
I GIVE YOU THE SO CALLED FOUNDING FATHERS, ALL MASONS....
WASHINGTON/ADAMS/JEFFERSON & MADISON... 
OTHER PICTURES COMING UP...

Bella's comments... In secret code, Adams meant;
Men of the Order, the Mason (Click) Order...
ZIONIST

#1 US Presidents....All criminals????  ><<>

George Washington 1789-97 (8 yrs)






#2 John Adams 1797-1801  (4yrs)







#3 Thomas Jefferson 1801-09 (8 Yrs)   
Founded West Point. Vice Pres.
to John Adams by 3 points.
The nuclius Manicello Library in West VA to later
start the US Library of Congress.  A Slave owner,
ruthless/vicious politician, who started the winner
gets all presidential system in motion.






#4 James Madison 1809-17 (8 Yrs)




  

#5 James Monroe 1817-25 (8 Yrs)




 

#6 John Quincy Adams 1825-29 (4 Yrs)





#7 Andrew Jackson 1829-37 (8 Yrs)

 




#8th US President -Martin Van Buren 1837-41 (4 Yrs)



 

#9th US President -Williiam Henry Harrison (1841)





 

#10th US President -John Tyler 1841-45 (4 Yrs)






#11th US President -James Polk 1845-49 (4 Yrs)



  



#12th US President -Zachary Taylor 1849-50 (1 Yr ???)






#13th US President -Millard Fillmore 1850-53 (3 Yrs ? )






#14th US President -Franklin Pierce 1853-57 (4 Yrs)






#15th US President -James Buchanan 1857-61 (4 Yrs)






#16th US President - Abraham Lincoln 1861-65                       
The Republican Party was founded under this president
(60 yrs since the formation of The Democratic party founded
under Pres. Thomas Jefferson 1801-09) .  That                     (4 Yrs Assasinated)






#17th US President - Andrew I. Johnson 1865-69 (4 Yrs)







#18th US President -Ulysses S. Grant 1869-77 (8 Yrs)







#19th US President -Rutherford B. Hayes 1877-81 (4 Yrs)







# 20th US President -James Garfield 1881 (  ? )






#21th US President -Chester Arthur 1881-85 (4 Yrs)






#22th*(A) US President -Grover Cleveland 1885-89 (4 Yrs)






 
#23rd US President -Benjamin Harrison 1889-93 (4 Yrs)







# 24th*(A) US President -Grover Cleveland 1893-97 (4 Yrs) 






 
#25nd US President -William Mckinley 1897-1901 (4 Yrs)



  



#26rd US President -Theodore Roosevelt 1901-09 (8 Yrs)






#27th US President -William Howard Taft 1909-13 (4 Yrs)






#28th US President -Woodrow Wilson 1913-21 (8 Yrs)







#29th US President -Warren Harding 1921-23 (2 Yrs Assasinated)







#30th US President -Calvin Coolidge 1923-29 (6 Yrs)






#31th US President -Herbert Hoover 1929-33






#32th US President -Franklin D. Roosevelt 1933-45 (12 Yrs)






#33th US President -Harry S. Truman 1945-53 (8 Yrs)






#34th US President -Dwight Eisenhower 1953-61 (8Yrs)






#35th US President -John F. Kennedy 1961-63 (2 Yrs Assasinated)






#36rd US President -Lyndon Johnson 1963-69 (6 Yrs)






#37th US President -Richard Nixon 1969-74 (5 Yrs, Impeached)






#38th US President -Gerald Ford 1974-77 (3 Yrs Interim post)






#39th US President -Jimmy Carter 1977-81






#40th US President -Ronald Reagan 1981-89 (8 Yrs)






#41th US President -George Herbert Walker Bush 1989-93





#42th US President -William Clinton 1993-2001 (8 Yrs, Not Impeached)






#43th  US President -George Walker Bush 2001-05 (8 Yrs, Not Impeached!!!)







#44th. Barack Jusin Obama (Elected 11/04/08)

...NO BRICK LAYERS HERE!!!!... SECRET SOCIETIES ANY ONE???
¨HERE ARE ONLY A FEW OF SOME HISTORIC LEGENDARY CRIMINALS WHO WERE GIVEN A SUPREME INNER    
¨CIRCLE PRIVILEGE (THE US PRESIDENCY) UNDER OATH, TO CONCEAL A POWERFUL "SHADOW GOVERNMENT",
AND PROTECT/DEFEND ALL INTERESTS OF THE MASONIC ORDER (SCOTTISH RIGHT) FOUNDED IN...
¨PLEASE READ THE ESOTERIC WRITINGS ON 1871 BY ALBERT PIKE-"MORALS & DOGMAS", PUBLISHED ON 1871.  MR. PIKE SERVED AS LEADER OF THE SCOTTISH RIGHT BETWEEN 1869 TO 1891. 
¨IN CONTRAST TO MR. PIKE'S exclusive MATERIAL, AN OTHER CRITICAL RESEARCHED COMPILATION READ IS MR. RALPH EPPERSON'S BOOK "THE UNSEEN HAND - An Introduction to the Conspiratorial View of History", published in 1985 by Publius Press, 2100 So. Philamena Place, Suite C, Tucson, Arizona 85730.
¨IN THIS 488 PAGE REVEALING PAGE TURNER, WHICH THOROUGHLY
EXPOSES THE BEHIND THE SCENE DYNAMICS THAT HAVE
CONTROLLED THE WORLD THROUGHOUT HISTORY...  Bella De Soto
¨In 1985 MR. EPPERSON DESCRIBED THIS MATERIAL AS FOLLOWS:
This book is, in reality, 100 books condensed into one.  Nowhere else can you find such a compact overview of the conspiratorial forces that have shaped the mayor world events of the past 300 years.  It's all here - from the French Revolution to The current turmoil in Latin America,  from the Federal Reserve System and The World Bank.  If you are looking for just one, comprehensive book to bring it all together in an easy-to=understand terms, this is that book.
Constitution anyone????

The following material is from my up coming future Book...  An expose on the US presidency;that all those taken the oath to defend the US interests has been a well lid farce ...  Are all US presidents criminals?????

On July 4th, 1776, The Western Northern lands (Later to be known as The US), signed a Declaration of Independence from Great Britain's colonizing/tyrannical/taxing & economic systems that was being imposed on these lands, due to their long time land conquests.

OK, but what needed to happen next for these lands to cohesively operate within a collective social, commerce, taxing and more importantly for the times being developed, politically?
Here's some background:
Between 1776 and 1780, every state had written its own constitution, and even before the Declaration of Independence was signed , New Hampshire, South Carolina, Virginia and New Jersey (in that order) had adopted provisional constitutions, and Rhode island had converted its original colonial charter to the equivalent of a constitution by removing all references to Great Britain and king George III.  Soon by the end of 1776, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, North Carolina, and Connecticut (in that order) had followed suit.  And in 1777, Georgia, New York, and Vermont followed the craze, so in June of 1780 the Massachusetts constitutional convention ratified its own state constitution.  Thirteen states in all…

So now comes crunch time…
Decision time became a major preoccupation for this emerging nation!  Well, those who would benefit by rearranging the new political system structure under which a very few would have a say so over the very many got very busy…

Thus, an effort to forge a new nation began, for these lands to weather be governed
as a loose federation of 13 independent states or would it be a single unified nation, made up of separate, but independent states?

So, it would take ten more years for a Convention to be convened where a greater number of states would begin to participate in dialogue on the Articles of a Confederation.  However, all along, these Articles of Confederation were being hammered out between some states, interested parties, etc. In effect, it created a "Continental Congress".  Under this Continental Congress a national government would function solely through its legislature managed by this Congress.

Finally, this Congress found the time to approve the fist American constitution
on November 15, 1777, known as The Articles of Confederation.

This new Congress was empowered to declare war and make peace, draft men for the army, conduct diplomatic relations with foreign countries, regulate American Indian affairs, coin money, and issue currency.  But Congress could not levy taxes and was therefore entirely dependent on the individual states to contribute monies voluntarily to enable Congress to carry out its national duties.  Indeed, the Articles left no doubt that the states were supreme over this newly formed Congress, where each state retained its sovereignty, freedom, independence, every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States in congress assembled.
Congress could recommend laws to the states, but each state held final authority to pass only such legislation as it saw fit, regardless of any conflicts among the different states.

Further, the Articles established no single head of the national government nor did it institute a system of national courts.

The very organization of this new government under the articles of Federation, fostered
a weak, leaderless, and decentralized system.  Delegates to Congress were selected annually by state legislatures.   No delegate could serve more than three out of every six years, thereby preventing experienced representatives from helping to improve the functioning of the national government on a consistent basis.  To add to the lack of continuity, sessions of congress rotated among Philadelphia, Princeton, Annapolis, and New York City and on many occasions not enough state representatives were present to constitute a quorum (the minimum number necessary to conduct a valid session), thereby preventing any business from being accomplished.

Meanwhile, what was being now called "America", was still fighting a war with Britain, which did not end until Lord Cornwallis surrendered to George Washington at Yorktown in 1781.

But to skip over much detail, on September 17, 1787, after the final draft of the Constitution was read to the delegates, Benjamin Franklin made an impassioned plea to any who had reservations and join in unanimously supporting it.

Franklin confessed that 'there are several parts of this Constitution which I do not at present approve," but having lived so long he said he had learned "to pay more respect to the judgment of others."  He observed that most men "think themselves in possession of all truth." 

However, in 1776, an opportunity to remove the stain of slavery was squandered.  Despite the principles of equality and freedom that animated the declaration of independence and despite the devotion of all the delegates to these abstract ideals, at no point did the Convention officially consider the abolition of slavery.

And since these struggles for independence, 41 Presidents have been swarmed into the US Office of the presidency...
Constitution anyone????

The following material to the right >>> is from my up coming future Book...  An expose on the US presidency;that all those taken the oath to defend the US interests has been a well lid farce ...  Are all US presidents criminals????? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
To vote or not to Vote...
THROUGH AGELESS GREED OF POWER, THESE MEN (SEE BELOW) HAVE BROUGHT THE HUMAN RACE COMPLETE DEVASTATION, BOTH MATERIALLY AND PHYSICALLY

HOW MUCH MORE HARM CAN THE GLOBE SUSTAIN?????
How many more deaths can The Globe sustain????
IMPERIALISM...

1. IMPERIAL STATE, OF AN EMPIRE, EMPEROR, OR EMPRESS.
2. THE POLICY OF FORMING AND MAINTAINING AN EMPIRE,
    AS BY ESTABLISHING COLONIES, ETC.
3. THE POLICY OF SEEKING TO DOMINATE THE AFFAIRS
    OF WEAKER COUNTRIES--- NOUN - IMPERIALIST, ADJ.-IMPERIALISTIC.
IMPERCEPTIVE...
1. NOT PERCEIVING.
IMPERCEPTIBLE...
1. NOT EASILY PERCEIVED BY THE  SENSES, OR THE MIND;VERY SLIGHT, SUBTLE, ETC, ADJ - IMPERCEPTIBLY. 

USHER IN THE MOVIE INDUSTRY...

FROM THE START OF THE MOVIE INDUSTRY, THE US WAR DEPARTMENT SAW THE PERFECT PROXY BY WHICH TO ADVANCE ITS WAR PROFITABLE PROPAGANDA DESIGNED TO AN UNSUSPECTING NAIVE AUDIENCE, THE US POPULATION....

THE PENTAGON, UNDER THE MCCARTHY ILLEGAL PERSECUTION EFFORT DURING THE 40' S AND 50' S OF SO CALLED COMMUNISTS IN THE MOVIE INDUSTRY, MANAGED TO BRING THIS INDUSTRY TO ITS KNEE, IN ORDER TO FULLY CUT OFF ALL OPPOSITION TO US FALSE PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGNS.

THUS, COMPLETE MEDIA CONTROL...
SO NEVER BEFORE HAS THE INDEPENDENT MEDIA MOVEMENT BEEN MORE CRUCIAL TO OUR POPULATION IN THE US AND THE WORLD!!!

WHILE THIS ACTIVIST MEDIA MOVEMENT HAS BEEN ON THE GO SINCE THE EARLY 20' S, IT HAD NOT REACHED A BROADER AWARENESS AMONGST MANY ALERT FOLK TO ENGAGE IN ITS FIGHT TO ABOLISH CORPORATE MEDIA MONOPOLY AND REDISTRIBUTE BACK TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES, OR DECENTRALIZE IT'S CONTROL... 

DURING THE THEN US PRESIDENT RONALD REAGAN (1970' S), HE BEGAN THE SHIFT FROM A DECENTRALIZED/DIVERSE MEDIA SPECTRUM, OR MARKET PLACE, TOWARD FAVORING THE LARGE CORPORATIONS TO OWN MORE AND MORE TV AND RADIO STATIONS....

FINALLY, THE FINAL NAIL WAS HAMMERED, DUE TO THE 1995-1996 FCC-FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION'S CHANGE OF POLICIES PUSHED BY THEN DEMOCRAT PRESIDENT WILLIAM  J. CLINTON, AND REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN NEWT GINGRICH, TO COMPLETELY CLOSE OUT ALL AVAILABILITY OF TV / RADIO LOCAL PARTICIPATION, AND TO GIVE IT ALL TO FIVE CORPORATIONS SUCH AS
GE; WHO MANUFACTURES MOST ARMAMENTS USED IN ALL US WARS-MOST BENEFICIAL TO GE ARE THE BILLIONS IT EARNS WHILE BILLIONS OF HUMAN BEING ARE MASSACRED BY ITS MILITARY ARMS!!! WALT DESNEY; THE SINGLE LARGEST HISTORIC PUSHER OF SUBLIMINAL BRAINWASHING FANTASY OF US PROPAGANDA/MISINFORMATION THROUGHOUT THE GLOBE!!!  AOL-TIME WANNER; ALSO IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS WALT DESNEY, BUT ALSO WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES WITH MICROSOFT/PENTAGON TO TAKE OVER THE INTERNET!!! RUPPERT MURDOCH; AUSTRALIAN MEDIA MOGUL, WHOSE EMPIRE BOTH IN AUTRALIA / ENGLAND WAS BUILT ON SUBVERSIVE INFO, SENSATIONALISM, NOT REALITIES!!!  AND VIACOM; OWNS RIGHTS TO MOST ALL VIDEOS/MOVIES CONSUMED BY AN UNINFORMED PUBLIC!!!!
-TIME FOR JUSTICE-
IMPERIALISM...
-TIME FOR JUSTICE-
-TIME FOR JUSTICE-
> From : Bella De Soto
> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:51:58 -0700
> Subject: Fw: Ramsey Clark Letter to UN

> The following letter by Former U.S. Attorney General
> Ramsey Clark has been sent to all members of the UN
> Security Council, with copies to the UN General Assembly.
>
>
> September 20, 2002
>
> Secretary General Kofi Annan
> United Nations
> New York, NY
>
> Dear Secretary General Annan,
>
> George Bush will invade Iraq unless restrained by the
> United Nations. Other international organizations--
> including the European Union, the African Union, the OAS,
> the Arab League, stalwart nations courageous enough to
> speak out against superpower aggression, international
> peace movements, political leadership, and public opinion
> within the United States--must do their part for peace. If
> the United Nations, above all, fails to oppose a U.S.
> invasion of Iraq, it will forfeit its honor, integrity and
> raison d?etre.
>
> A military attack on Iraq is obviously criminal;
> completely inconsistent with urgent needs of the Peoples
> of the United Nations; unjustifiable on any legal or moral
> ground; irrational in light of the known facts; out of
> proportion to other existing threats of war and violence;
> and a dangerous adventure risking continuing conflict
> throughout the region and far beyond for years to come.
> The most careful analysis must be made as to why the world
> is subjected to such threats of violence by its only
> superpower, which could so safely and importantly lead us
> on the road to peace, and how the UN can avoid the human
> tragedy of yet another major assault on Iraq and the
> powerful stimulus for retaliatory terrorism it would
> create.
>
> 1. President George Bush Came to Office Determined to
> Attack Iraq and Change its Government.
>
> George Bush is moving apace to make his war unstoppable
> and soon. Having stated last Friday that he did not
> believe Iraq would accept UN inspectors, he responded to
> Iraq?s prompt, unconditional acceptance by calling any
> reliance on it a ?false hope? and promising to attack Iraq
> alone if the UN does not act. He is obsessed with the
> desire to wage war against Iraq and install his surrogates
> to govern Iraq by force. Days after the most bellicose
> address ever made before the United Nations--an
> unprecedented assault on the Charter of the United
> Nations, the rule of law and the quest for peace--the U.S.
> announced it was changing its stated targets in Iraq over
> the past eleven years, from retaliation for threats and
> attacks on U.S. aircraft which were illegally invading
> Iraq?s airspace on a daily basis. How serious could those
> threats and attacks have been if no U.S. aircraft was ever
> hit? Yet hundreds of people were killed in Iraq by U.S.
> rockets and bombs, and not just in the so called ?no fly
> zone,? but in Baghdad itself. Now the U.S. proclaims its
> intentions to destroy major military facilities in Iraq in
> preparation for its invasion, a clear promise of
> aggression now. Every day there are threats and more
> propaganda is unleashed to overcome resistance to George
> Bush?s rush to war. The acceleration will continue until
> the tanks roll, unless nonviolent persuasion prevails.
>
> 2. George Bush Is Leading the United States and Taking the
> UN and All Nations Toward a Lawless World of Endless Wars.
>
>
> George Bush in his ?War on Terrorism? has asserted his
> right to attack any country, organization, or people
> first, without warning in his sole discretion. He and
> members of his administration have proclaimed the old
> restraints that law sought to impose on aggression by
> governments and repression of their people, no longer
> consistent with national security. Terrorism is such a
> danger, they say, that necessity compels the U.S. to
> strike first to destroy the potential for terrorist acts
> from abroad and to make arbitrary arrests, detentions,
> interrogations, controls and treatment of people abroad
> and within the U.S. Law has become the enemy of public
> safety. ?Necessity is the argument of tyrants.? ?Necessity
> never makes a good bargain.?
>
> Heinrich Himmler, who instructed the Nazi Gestapo ?Shoot
> first, ask questions later, and I will protect you,? is
> vindicated by George Bush. Like the Germany described by
> Jorge Luis Borges in Deutsches Requiem, George Bush has
> now ?proffered (the world) violence and faith in the
> sword,? as Nazi Germany did. And as Borges wrote, it did
> not matter to faith in the sword that Germany was
> defeated. ?What matters is that violence ... now rules.?
> Two generations of Germans have rejected that faith. Their
> perseverance in the pursuit of peace will earn the respect
> of succeeding generations everywhere.
>
> The Peoples of the United Nations are threatened with the
> end of international law and protection for human rights
> by George Bush?s war on terrorism and determination to
> invade Iraq.
>
> Since George Bush proclaimed his ?war on terrorism,? other
> countries have claimed the right to strike first. India
> and Pakistan brought the earth and their own people closer
> to nuclear conflict than at any time since October 1962 as
> a direct consequence of claims by the U.S. of the
> unrestricted right to pursue and kill terrorists, or
> attack nations protecting them, based on a unilateral
> decision without consulting the United Nations, a trial,
> or revealing any clear factual basis for claiming its
> targets are terrorists and confined to them.
>
> There is already a near epidemic of nations proclaiming
> the right to attack other nations or intensify violations
> of human rights of their own people on the basis of George
> Bush?s assertions of power in the war against terrorism.
> Mary Robinson, in her quietly courageous statements as her
> term as UN High Commissioner for Human Rights ended, has
> spoken of the ?ripple effect? U.S. claims of right to
> strike first and suspend fundamental human rights
> protection is having.
>
> On September 11, 2002, Colombia, whose new administration
> is strongly supported by the U.S., ?claimed new authority
> to arrest suspects without warrants and declare zones
> under military control,? including ?[N]ew powers, which
> also make it easier to wiretap phones and limit
> foreigners? access to conflict zones... allow security
> agents to enter your house or office without a warrant at
> any time of day because they think you?re suspicious.?
> These additional threats to human rights follow
> Post-September 11 ?emergency? plans to set up a network of
> a million informants in a nation of forty million. See,
> New York Times, September 12, 2002, p. A7.
>
>    3. The United States, Not Iraq, Is the Greatest Single
> Threat to the Independence and Purpose of the United
> Nations.
>
>    President Bush?s claim that Iraq is a threat justifying
> war is false. Eighty percent of Iraq?s military capacity
> was destroyed in 1991 according to the Pentagon. Ninety
> percent of materials and equipment required to manufacture
> weapons of mass destruction was destroyed by UN inspectors
> during more than eight years of inspections. Iraq was
> powerful, compared to most of its neighbors, in 1990.
> Today it is weak. One infant out of four born live in Iraq
> weighs less than 2 kilos, promising short lives, illness
> and impaired development. In 1989, fewer than one in
> twenty infants born live weighed less than two kilos. Any
> threat to peace Iraq might become is remote, far less than
> that of many other nations and groups and cannot justify a
> violent assault. An attack on Iraq will make attacks in
> retaliation against the U.S. and governments which support
> its actions far more probable for years to come.
>
> George Bush proclaims Iraq a threat to the authority of
> the United Nations while U.S.-coerced UN sanctions
> continue to cause the death rate of the Iraqi people to
> increase. Deaths caused by sanctions have been at
> genocidal levels for twelve years. Iraq can only plead
> helplessly for an end to this crime against its people.
> The UN role in the sanctions against Iraq compromise and
> stain the UN?s integrity and honor. This makes it all the
> more important for the UN now to resist this war.
>
> Inspections were used as an excuse to continue sanctions
> for eight years while thousands of Iraqi children and
> elderly died each month. Iraq is the victim of criminal
> sanctions that should have been lifted in 1991. For every
> person killed by terrorist acts in the U.S. on 9/11, five
> hundred people have died in Iraq from sanctions.
>
> It is the U.S. that threatens not merely the authority of
> the United Nations, but its independence, integrity and
> hope for effectiveness. The U.S. pays UN dues if, when and
> in the amount it chooses. It coerces votes of members. It
> coerces choices of personnel on the Secretariat. It
> rejoined UNESCO to gain temporary favor after 18 years of
> opposition to its very purposes. It places spies in UN
> inspection teams.
>
> The U.S. has renounced treaties controlling nuclear
> weapons and their proliferation, voted against the
> protocol enabling enforcement of the Biological Weapons
> Convention, rejected the treaty banning land mines,
> endeavored to prevent its creation and since to cripple
> the International Criminal Court, and frustrated the
> Convention on the Child and the prohibition against using
> children in war. The U.S. has opposed virtually every
> other international effort to control and limit war,
> protect the environment, reduce poverty and protect
> health.
>
> George Bush cites two invasions of other countries by Iraq
> during the last 22 years. He ignores the many scores of
> U.S. invasions and assaults on other countries in Africa,
> Asia, and the Americas during the last 220 years, and the
> permanent seizure of lands from Native Americans and other
> nations--lands like Florida, Texas, Arizona, New Mexico,
> California, and Puerto Rico, among others, seized by force
> and threat.
>
> In the same last 22 years the U.S. has invaded, or
> assaulted Grenada, Nicaragua, Libya, Panama, Haiti,
> Somalia, Sudan, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and others
> directly, while supporting assaults and invasions
> elsewhere in Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas.
>
> It is healthy to remember that the U.S. invaded and
> occupied little Grenada in 1983 after a year of threats,
> killing hundreds of civilians and destroying its small
> mental hospital, where many patients died. In a surprise
> attack on the sleeping and defenseless cities of Tripoli
> and Benghazi in April 1986, the U.S. killed hundreds of
> civilians and damaged four foreign embassies. It launched
> 21 Tomahawk cruise missiles against the El Shifa
> pharmaceutical plant in Khartoum in August 1998,
> destroying the source of half the medicines available to
> the people of Sudan. For years it has armed forces in
> Uganda and southern Sudan fighting the government of
> Sudan. The U.S. has bombed Iraq on hundreds of occasions
> since the Gulf War, including this week, killing hundreds
> of people without a casualty or damage to an attacking
> plane.
>
> 4. Why Has George Bush Decided The U.S. Must Attack Iraq Now?
>
>    There is no rational basis to believe Iraq is a threat
> to the United States, or any other country. The reason to
> attack Iraq must be found elsewhere.
>
> As governor of Texas, George Bush presided over scores of
> executions, more than any governor in the United States
> since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 (after a
> hiatus from 1967). He revealed the same zeal he has shown
> for ?regime change? for Iraq when he oversaw the
> executions of minors, women, retarded persons and aliens
> whose rights under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
> Relations of notification of their arrest to a foreign
> mission of their nationality were violated. The Supreme
> Court of the U.S. held that executions of a mentally
> retarded person constitute cruel and unusual punishment in
> violation of the U.S. Constitution. George Bush addresses
> the United Nations with these same values and willfulness.
>
> His motives may include to save a failing Presidency which
> has converted a healthy economy and treasury surplus into
> multi-trillion dollar losses; to fulfill the dream, which
> will become a nightmare, of a new world order to serve
> special interests in the U.S.; to settle a family grudge
> against Iraq; to weaken the Arab nation, one people at a
> time; to strike a Muslim nation to weaken Islam; to
> protect Israel, or make its position more dominant in the
> region; to secure control of Iraq?s oil to enrich U.S.
> interests, further dominate oil in the region and control
> oil prices. Aggression against Iraq for any of these
> purposes is criminal and a violation of a great many
> international conventions and laws including the General
> Assembly Resolution on the Definition of Aggression of
> December 14, 1974.
>
> Prior regime changes by the U.S. brought to power among a
> long list of tyrants, such leaders as the Shah of Iran,
> Mobutu in the Congo, Pinochet in Chile, all replacing
> democratically elected heads of government.  5. A Rational
> Policy Intended to Reduce the Threat of Weapons of Mass
> Destruction in The Middle East Must Include Israel.
>
>    A UN or U.S. policy of selecting enemies of the U.S. for
> attack is criminal and can only heighten hatred, division,
> terrorism and lead to war.  The U.S. gives Israel far more aid
> per capita than the total per capita income of sub Sahara Africans
> from all sources.
> U.S.-coerced sanctions have reduced per capita income for
> the people of Iraq by 75% since 1989. Per capita income in
> Israel over the past decade has been approximately 12
> times the per capita income of Palestinians.
>
> Israel increased its decades-long attacks on the
> Palestinian people, using George Bush?s proclamation of
> war on terrorism as an excuse, to indiscriminately destroy
> cities and towns in the West Bank and Gaza and seize more
> land in violation of international law and repeated
> Security Council and General Assembly resolutions.
>
> Israel has a stockpile of hundreds of nuclear warheads
> derived from the United States, sophisticated rockets
> capable of accurate delivery at distances of several
> thousand kilometers, and contracts with the U.S. for joint
> development of more sophisticated rocketry and other arms with the U.S.
>
> Possession of weapons of mass destruction by a single
> nation in a region with a history of hostility promotes a
> race for proliferation and war. The UN must act to reduce
> and eliminate all weapons of mass destruction, not submit
> to demands to punish areas of evil and enemies of the
> superpower that possesses the majority of all such weapons
> and capacity for their delivery.
>
> Israel has violated and ignored more UN Resolutions for
> forty years than any other nation. It has done so with impunity.
>
> The violation of Security Council resolutions cannot be
> the basis for a UN-approved assault on any nation, or
> people, in a time of peace, or the absence of a threat of
> imminent attack, but comparable efforts to enforce
> Security Council resolutions must be made against all
> nations who violate them.
>
>    6. The Choice Is War Or Peace.
>
> The UN and the U.S. must seek peace, not war. An attack on
> Iraq may open a Pandora?s box that will condemn the world
> to decades of spreading violence. Peace is not only
> possible; it is essential, considering the heights to
> which science and technology have raised the human art of
> planetary and self-destruction.
>
> If George Bush is permitted to attack Iraq with or without
> the approval of the UN, he will become Public Enemy Number
> One--and the UN itself worse than useless, an accomplice
> in the wars it was created to end. The Peoples of the
> World then will have to find some way to begin again if
> they hope to end the scourge of war.
>
> This is a defining moment for the United Nations. Will it
> stand strong, independent and true to its Charter,
> international law and the reasons for its being, or will
> it submit to the coercion of a superpower leading us
> toward a lawless world and condone war against the cradle of civilization?
>
> Do not let this happen.
>> Sincerely,
>> Ramsey Clark
> ______________________________________________________________________
> STOP THE WAR ON IRAQ BEFORE IT STARTS!
> NATIONAL MARCH ON WASHINGTON DC
> Saturday, October 26, 2002
To: All subscribers
> For more information contact: International A.N.S.W.E.R.
> at: Washington DC: (202) 332 5757
> New York, NY: (212) 633 6646
> www.internationalanswer.org
More individual foot notes of global criminality committed by each U.S. President to follow...
U.S. FLAG HISTORY
The design of the U.S. flag was derived from designs used for flags at the beginning of the American Revolution. On June 14, 1777, Congress declared the flag to be 13 alternating red and white stripes with a union of 13 white stars in a blue field. In 1794, after Kentucky and Vermont joined the Union, Congress added two stars and two stripes. In 1818, when five more states had joined, Congress again changed the design to 13 stripes, representing the original 13 states, and 20 stars, with a provision that an additional star be added on the admission of each new state.

Although popular tradition has invested the colors of the flag with symbolism--red for valor, white for liberty or purity, and blue for justice, loyalty, and perseverance--there is no document that historians can point to that gives this symbolism official standing.

From: www.saratogaflag.com


In the words of President John Adams (circa 1800),
"May none but honest and wise Men
ever rule under this roof."
However, Jefferson, did notably say (paraphrased): "There must a Revolution every twenty years in this land (US), to make sure all greedy scoundrels are removed from elected office, and the People can once again rule to elect those whom will serve their interests"...
IMPERIALISM...
page5
Contact Bella
Think
                               World Can't Wait - National: http://www.worldcantwait.org
DRIVE OUT THE BUSH REGIME...                               
              866.973.4463, News from the Los Angeles Chapter - 213.924.8571

Voices Against Torture
Participate in these events, wear orange, and spread the campaign to fire and disbar John Yoo.
It's up to us! - Neither Obama nor the Democratic leadership have sought to repeal the 2006 Military Commissions Act which legalizes torture, grants immunity, and strips habeas corpus. "There will be no savior from the Democratic Party" from the call to Drive Out the Bush Regime!
Sun., Oct. 19th - 3-5 PM
WHO: Dr. Muzammil Siddiqi, Chairman of the Shura Council will present an Islamic perspective on “Human Dignity & Torture.”

WHERE: IMAN Center - 3376 Motor Ave. , West LA 90034 .

WHAT:   Documentary showing of Ghosts of Abu Ghraib

Torture has now become an acceptable instrument of US policy.  Neither presidential candidate has spoken out against this policy.  It is up to us to stop this now-legalized crime against humanity.

Light refreshments will be provided and there is no fee to attend the program.

Islamic Shura Council is a participating member of National Religious Campaign Against Torture and has partnered with the Interfaith Communities United for Justice and Peace in reaching out to people of all faiths to work toward ending torture in our name.

To RSVP or for more information, please call Shura Council at 714.239.6473. 

*******************************************************************
Sun. & Mon., Oct. 19th & 20th - 7:30 PM
WHAT: FACE IT - Torture in the 21st Century:  An Evening of Theater, Art & Discussion

  www.faceit-torture.com

WHERE: Highways Performance Space, 1651 18th St., Santa Monica, CA 90404 

WHO:   Robert Adanto directs Harold Pinter's One for the Road.  Set in a police state, Mr. Pinter's award winning play is a chilling study of power and powerlessness.  Featuring Robert Adanto, Bill Heck, Angela Ledgerwood & Rudy Summers.

A post-performance discussion will be led by Michael Rapkin, a member of the ACLU Union Board and Foundation Board, who has sued both the President of the U.S. and the Secretary of State while representing his client, a suspected enemy combatant, held in Guantanamo Prison for five years until his release in January 2007. 
*********************************************************************************************
Wed., Oct. 22nd - 12 Noon
WHAT: 13th Annual National Day of Protest to Stop Police Brutality, Repression
and the Criminalization of a Generation

WHERE: Gather at Parker Center - 150 N Los Angeles St  -12pm
March to Mac Arthur Park, 7th & Alvarado - 2pm
Rally - 4pm
No More Stolen Lives vigil - 6pm

WHO: You, your family and friends. FIGHT BACK! WEAR BLACK!
WWW.myspace.com/october22nd_la    323.446.7459

SIGN UP FOR THIS TRUTH NEWS SITE
A News Service Compiled by G. Edward Griffin
2008 OCTOBER 11 – OCTOBER 17
Click on headlines to see full articles
If original sources are missing, click on Cached.

     Star indicates article worth printing for future reference.
   
     Camera indicates video or slideshow.
    
      Speaker indicates audio.
    
      Asterisk indicates an amazing event or
      phenomenon.  (See them all together here.)

“Greater than the force of mighty armies is the power of an idea whose time has come.”
“Think of the good things you have instead of the good things you don&apos;t have and you will find contentment.”
Switzerland: Government uses taxpayer's funds to bail out UBS and Credit Suisse, the country's two largest banks, and takes 10% ownership of them. Guardian 2008 Oct 16 (Cached)

GOLD, 3 yrs. Click for today's price.
Freedom Force International is a network of men and women from all parts of the world who are concerned over loss of personal liberty and expansion of government power. They are not mere complainers. They have a plan to do something about it. They also share a common belief in The Creed of Freedom, which is a statement of principles that guide them in their mission to build a better world.

Totalitarianism is on the rise everywhere because advocates of big government have taken leadership control of the power centers within every society. Power centers are organizations and social groupings – such as political parties, labor unions, church groups, media centers, and professional societies – that hold political power based on their claim to represent their members and on their ability to lead public opinion. It has taken many years for them to achieve this dominance over society, but they have succeeded. It does no good to complain or to theorize about what should be done. As long as advocates of big government hold the power, nothing will change.

WE MUST NOT BE LIKE CATS
One of the most profound differences between dogs and cats is that cats focus on effects while dogs focus on causes. If you toss a pebble at a cat, it will look at the pebble. If you toss it at a dog, it will look at you.

In this respect, too many people are like cats. They are preoccupied with the details of their loss of security, freedom, and privacy, and they flutter like wing-clipped pigeons, complaining about this and that without knowing why these things are happening. By contrast, members of Freedom Force focus on the cause and work to eliminate it. The degeneration of civilization is not the result of blind forces of history operating beyond comprehension or control. It is planned and caused by a small but well defined group of people who believe this decline is necessary for what they fondly call The New World Order but which we recognize as high-tech feudalism in which mankind will be condemned to live in perpetual subservience to elitist rulers.

The identities of these elitists are known. They have names. They belong to organizations. They meet together to create strategies and they work jointly to implement them. They dominate the power centers of society. We will not escape their plans by looking only at what they are doing. We must focus on them and remove them from their present positions of power. Any other plan of action is doomed to failure.

That, however, is not enough. If we focus solely on the identities and personalities of those who are promoting the decline of liberty, we will be stumped by the fact that, even if we should succeed in removing them from their positions of influence, there are many more just like them waiting to step into their places. In the final analysis, it’s not the names and identities or political party affiliations of these individuals that matters as much as what they believe, what ideology they hold. Their ideology has a name. It’s called collectivism, a concept that government is master and people must obey. It’s to no avail to remove one collectivist from power only to replace him with another one – which has been the pattern for all too many years. It is time to stop acting like cats, stop being forever fascinated by the personalities and deeds of our leaders. We must be more like dogs and focus on the ideology of our leaders, because that is the cause of their deeds.

The solution is simple. It is to take back control of the power centers of society, one-by-one, just the way they were captured in the first place. Replace the collectivists with people who have no personal agendas except to defend freedom. This will unleash the vast human potential for prosperity and happiness that can be realized only in the absence of government oppression. However, to reach that goal, it will be necessary for those who cherish freedom to do more than complain and far more than just casting a vote every few years. They must reach for power. That is the reason for the motto of Freedom Force: Impotentes defendere libertatem non possunt, which is Latin for “Those without power cannot defend freedom.”

The Freedom Force strategy can be summarized as:
Don't fight city hall when you can BE city hall.

The mission of members of Freedom Force is to shape public policy within their respective countries in favor of personal and global freedom. The method is threefold: (1) dissemination of ideological and issue-related information, (2) instruction in how to become influential within community and national organizations, and (3) instruction in how to lawfully and constitutionally convert that influence into public policy. Members seek to become change agents so they truly can make a difference in the world.

Freedom Force is a global brotherhood of the most enlightened and dedicated people in the world. We are building an international network of leaders who, in spite of differences in nationality and culture, are in solidarity with the principles expressed in The Creed of Freedom. We now have members in sixty countries, and the number continues to grow. (See flags below.) Nothing like this has happened before in history. It is a powerful force that cannot be stopped. Welcome to the Brotherhood of Freedom.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom Force came into existence at a meeting on December 12, 2002, in the Dominican Republic where G. Edward Griffin was a speaker at an off-shore investment conference. After the conference, he invited anyone who was interested to attend a private presentation of what he thought would be needed to regain control of our lives and our freedom. About thirty people attended; and, after the presentation, just about everyone enrolled on the spot, including citizens from three countries. Freedom Force International was born.

Although we suddenly had dues-paying members, we were far from being an organization. We had no staff, no facilities, no operational procedures, no bylaws, no accounting system, no means of communicating with members, no web site, no checking account, no code of conduct, no money (except about $200 in donations), and not the foggiest idea of how to proceed.

The next two years were spent primarily getting all of those things in order. We weren’t ready for expansion until about 2005 when our web site finally began to take shape. This gave us global outreach and made it possible for people of like mind anywhere in the world to find us simply by surfing the Internet. Slowly but surely, our membership began to climb; and we added increasing numbers of flags representing countries where members resided. We believe strongly that a successful movement for liberty in today’s world must be international in scope, and it was gratifying to see that aspect of our strategy become a reality right from the beginning.

We have a long way to go before we can fulfill the grand vision shared by our founding members in 2002, but we also have come a long way since then. Although the size of our membership is the only secret we have, we now count them in the thousands – and the number is growing constantly. More important than numbers, however, is the quality of our membership and the leadership they provide. The most prominent among them are featured in the Freedom Force Hall of Honor (featured elsewhere on this page), but that is just the tip of the iceberg. All of our members are influential within their communities and are helping to create a leadership network that will counter and eventually defeat the collectivists who now dominate the power centers of society.

Eventually, there will be training and communication centers in many parts of the world. At present, the headquarters is located in Southern California. Inquiries should be sent to info@freedom-force.org

If this is your first visit to our web site, you may feel overpowered by the volume of information here, but do not be discouraged by that. This site is not intended to be read all at one time, although occasionally that does happen. It is designed to present the most important topics first and then offer convenient paths to secondary topics and current events. Information is updated daily, and we hope you will make it a habit to return often.

During your first visit, we strongly recommend that you familiarize yourself with the series of essays entitled The Future is Calling. This will introduce you to the core beliefs of Freedom Force. Everything else is built upon this, and it will be difficult to understand our perspectives on other issues without this background. To go directly to these essays, click here.

The World is always an Oyster to The Bildergerg Group, and all other such clandestine Organizations, that control the globe.  They make the decisions for us all without regard of the humanity.  All secret societies operate equally in the same notorious fashion, and have and do finance all global conflicts, so to always win, no matter who losses...
~~~Google: bilderberg

William Rodriquez, last man out of the Twin Towers on 9/11, tells about explosions in the basement prior to impact of the first plane. Added to 9/11 section. Apr 4

 
bella@bellads.info
Planting Seeds...

"The White Man's Burden".  "To civilize the savages..."  (Global control through religious Imperialist Colonization).
~THE VERY SIMPLE STRUCTURE...~
ALTHOUGH THESE GROUPS, OR SECRET SOCIETIES HAVE ORGANIZED AT DIFFERENT TIME IN HISTORY, THEIR OPERATIONS ARE SUSTANED BY EACH OTHER'S GLOBAL ELITE MEMBERSHIP OF STATUS & WEALTH.
~~~THUS, THEIR CONTROL OVER THE GLOBAL LARGE POPULATIONS IS SUPREME, AND KEPT VERY HIDDEN FROM COMMON EXPOSURE, BUT FOR THE MANY BOOKS, NOW VIDEOS DEDICATED TO TELLING THIS STORY...


~~Who is realy in control???
~~THE ROUND TABLE~~

AMERICA (USA)----THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS-FOUNDED IN 1921, NEW YORK CITY

AMERICA (USA) - EUROPE - JAPAN----THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION

UNITED KINGDOM - GLOBAL----ROYAL INTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS

ENVIRONMENT EUGENICS----CLUB OF ROME

EUROPE - USA - GLOBAL----THE BILDERBERG GROUP

AMERICA (USA)----(FALSE ENTITY)  THE UNITED NATIONS
"The White Man's Burden".  "To civilize the savages..."  (Global control through religious Imperialist Colonization)
John Bonifaz |John Bonifaz - Democrat for Massachusetts Secretary of State.
                                        www.johnbonifaz.com/  

The US effort to Impeach George W. Bush has been singularly
championed by John Bonifaz
about Five years ago...

I joined the fray by uniting with many nationwide through
Impeach Meetups across the states.
I began attending an LA Meetup to strategize for mass support.  However, the Democratic Party, while
complaintning about how Bush was conducting Business in Washington, DC, the would not move an inch to do the right thing, and to date we are still waiting!!!!

John Bonifaz continued to push for Impeachment, and eventually many other efforts sprang about with the same theme.

I regard Bonifaz as a hero in modern time, because while he has used his expertise to expose the current Bush Administration' criminal behaviour, he has managed to also run for public office, and maintain this ebergy light...
><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Recent Blog Posts
"They're Supposed to Count the Votes, Right?"
Submitted by Ofer Inbar on Thu, 09/21/2006 - 12:51pm.
del.icio.us
post to reddit [ crossposted at Blue Mass Group ]

For much of the year, I have worked for John Bonifaz, not just promoting his campaign online, but also covering election issues to inform people about the state of Democracy in America and the problems we need to fix.  On Tuesday, I dedicated the day to Sonia Chang-Diaz's campaign for state senate in the Second Suffolk district.

The two streams combined: Tuesday night, I found myself at the center of the kinds of voting problems I'd written about on John's blog.  Even before Wednesday's announcement that eight precincts had no vote tallies at all, we knew there were hundreds, if not thousands, of votes not counted, and the election results uncertain.  On Wednesday, the Chang-Diaz campaign called John Bonifaz to help guide them through the process of seeing all the votes counted.

I'd like to commend the Boston elections department for being as helpful as they have, on election night and in advance.  Especially John Donovan - if we pull through this mess and end up with a full and reliable count of the votes, it will be partly thanks to him.  But make no mistake: the votes have not been counted, even without considering the 8 precincts that submitted no tallies.  It's not yet time to think about a "recount" - we still need a real first count.

As Bonifaz said many times on the campaign trail, we didn't know about the problems in Florida until 2000, and most of us didn't know about the problems in Ohio until 2004; if we have a really close result in a prominent election, we would find out that we also have problems here in Massachusetts.  Perhaps this will be the election that brings them to our attention.

Count the Votes?

During most of the last couple of hours before polls closed, and the next few hours after, I held the line 1 telephone and fielded a majority of the incoming calls.  Signs of trouble started early in the evening: the first time I got a call from a volunteer asking "they're supposed to count the votes, right?" I almost didn't know what to make of it.


Speak Out : Speak OutP.O. Box 22748, Oakland CA 94609, 510.601.0182, info@speakoutnow.org · Speakers & Artists · Topics · Workshops · Calendars · Who's in the News ...
www.speakersandartists.org/ - 12k -
Speak Out - The Institute for Democratic Education and Culture is a national non-profit organization that educates, inspires and empowers young people to become actively engaged in society and to work for social justice.

As a center for progressive arts and politics, Speak Out’s activities include:

CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY EVENTS
Our network of 200 speakers, performers, scholars, artists, exhibits and films represents the breadth of social and political movements. We encourage critical and imaginative thinking about domestic and international issues through artistic and educational forums nationwide.
{Use our web site to review our roster, then contact us for more information on costs and availability and to schedule an event for your campus or community.}

EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS
Speak Out publishes and distributes educational materials, curriculum, and diversity resources. Through our on-line store, we also offer books, DVDs, CDs and other merchandise.

WORKSHOPS AND TRAININGS
We organize workshops, trainings and educational institutes to strengthen social justice organizing at high schools, colleges, universities, and in communities nationwide.

CONFERENCES
We participate in regional and national conferences and gatherings that promote and strengthen young peoples' engagement in activism.
­
E-mail John Bonifaz at:  nvir@nvir.org
John Bonifaz is the founder and executive director of the National Voting
Rights Institute. Founded in 1994, the Institute is a non-profit organization
dedicated to challenging the constitutionality of the current campaign finance
system across the country. Drawing on a line of U.S. Supreme Court cases
invalidating the poll tax, high candidate filing fees, and exclusionary white
primaries, the Institute argues that today's system of privately-financed
election campaigns operates as the newest wealth barrier in the political
process. Through litigation and public education, the Institute is redefining
the campaign finance question as a basic voting rights issue. Further, the
Institute serves as a leading force in the country for defending in court
meaningful campaign reforms enacted through legislation or ballot initiative at
the state and local level. The Institute is at the forefront of the growing
movement to challenge the U.S. Supreme Courtís 1976 ruling in Buckley v. Valeo, which struck down congressional campaign spending limits on First Amendment grounds, equating money with speech.

Bonifaz formerly served as the Staff Attorney for the Center for Responsive
Politics in Washington, D.C., a leading research authority on the influence of
private money in the electoral process. Mr. Bonifaz is the co-author with Jamin Raskin, a constitutional law professor at American Universityís Washington
College of Law, of two law review articles which argue that the current campaign finance system violates the constitutional guarantee of equal protection for all: ìEqual Protection and The Wealth Primary,î Yale Law &amp; Policy Review (Winter 1993) and ìThe Constitutional Imperative and Practical Superiority of Democratically Financed Elections,î Columbia Law Review (Spring 1994). He is also the co-author, with Professor Raskin, of The Wealth Primary: Campaign Fundraising and the Constitution, published in November 1994 by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Bonifaz is a 1999 recipient of a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship. In
awarding the five-year fellowship, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur
Foundation stated: Bonifaz, a public interest lawyer, uses innovative litigation to reexamine campaign finance reform arguments typically debated on first amendment grounds.   Through the National Voting Rights Institute, an organization he founded, Bonifaz recasts the legal arguments to focus on fourteenth amendment protections, challenging the relationship between money and politics.

Bonifaz is a 1992 cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School. He has written
and spoken extensively around the country on the anti-democratic nature of the private financing of public elections.
Topics :Law &amp; Social Justice /Democracy /Electoral Politics
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please contact Speak Out for more complete biographies,
publicity packets and information on costs and availability.

Home | Speakers &amp; Artists | Soapbox | Tours | Topics | Campaign | NACA
| Engagements&nbsp; John Bonifaz, founder and general counsel, formerly served as the staff attorney for the Washington, D.C.-based Center for Responsive Politics, a leading research authority on the influence of private money in federal elections. He is the co-author, with Jamin Raskin, of articles in the Yale Law &amp; Policy Review and the Columbia Law Review, which set forth the constitutional basis for the Institute's affirmative litigation work.

Mr. Bonifaz is a staff member with: NVRI Contact and Address Information: 27 School Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02108, Tel- (617) 624-3900&nbsp; f- (617) 624-3911&nbsp; Email: nvri@nvri.org

Get The News Fast!
Learn how the Institute is working for dramatic change of our campaign
finance system and is fighting to protect your constitutional right to
participate in the election process by joining our What's New email list to
receive news as it happens.
Send us your comments regarding campaign finance reform and the Institute's work.
If you are a reporter, you can subscribe to our Press Mailing List to
receive NVRI's press releases and statements as they are issued.

NVRI is within a few blocks of several MBTA train stations: Park Street
Station is on the Red and Green Lines; Downtown Crossing Station is on the
Orange and Red Lines; and State Street Station is on the Blue and Orange lines.


Bella with Former U.S. Attorney General >
Ramsey Clark
in 2002, LA, CA
Photo by Cindy Vito
Thanks...
QuickBooks
Consultant
Image below, is from "The Forbidden Book", extraordinary expose evolution of the U.S.A. begins as an Empire, by illegally invading and  destroying the Philippines/Cuba/Puerto Rico, and of course, Hawaii, immediately after Spain relinquished these lands during the fake accusations that Spain had sunk a U.S.A. Ship at sea!!!  Thus, provoking Spain into an unnecessary "American/Spanish war", only to gain its territories.  This deceitful campaign has been duplicated over many times over around the world, to again steal land and other resources, while destroying national infrastructure and populations globally...  This is "The White Men's Burden philosophy"...